PEACE IN THE CLASSROOM
Halifax District PTA
November 20, 1995
The Halifax District PTA and the Halifax District School Board held a
joint workshop on the subject of "Peace in the Classroom" on May 15,
1995. Participants broke up into two groups, including parents, board
members, and board staff, and discussed what their concerns were, and
what action should be taken on the issue. Subsequently, a small group of
interested parents from Halifax District PTA met, reviewed the comments
from the workshop, and developed the following summary.
WHAT IS "PEACE IN THE CLASSROOM"?
While recent incidents tend to draw our focus to violence, many people
prefer to focus their attention on "Peace in the Classroom", rather than
"Violence in our Schools".
"Peace in the Classroom" reflects the desire of parents that their
children should have the opportunity to learn in a safe environment.
There is a very great concern over our children's safety, but even when
we consider that our children are safe, there are concerns that
disruption in the classroom interferes with their learning.
SUMMARY OF DISCUSSIONS FROM MAY 15, 1995
While many issues were addressed at this meeting, the following themes
emerged:
- Dealing with the fear of violence, and concerns over disruption of
the learning environment, is a top priority with parents.
- Parents whose children have been subjected to violence have a
sense of
helplessness. They must return their child to the environment where the
violence occurred, without being able to be there to protect them, and
fear retaliation against their child should they pursue any action in
response to the violence, particularly if the consequences for the
offender are trivial.
- Our environment is changing, and we need to respond. More children
stay
in school who might have dropped out in the past, placing additional
demands on the system, while resources for dealing with problems are
dwindling.
- Successful solutions will be dependent on the development of
effective partnerships among many parts of the community, including:
- Teachers, principals, and their union representatives, who must be
involved in the development of solutions which they believe in, since
they will be the primary deliverers of those solutions
- Students, since they stand to lose the most if these problems are not
resolved, and because the majority are good kids who, with a little
support, can contribute enormously to improving things. Students are
there when problems occur, and with training in conflict resolution
techniques, can often prevent serious problems from developing.
- The police, who should become a positive and welcomed presence in our
schools
- Parents, especially the parents of children experiencing problems, but
also parents who are willing and able to help
- The community at large, which benefits from a peaceful and productive
school system, and which has untapped resources to contribute
- Formal programs exist which could be used in our schools (Second
Step, Crimestoppers, etc.)
- One key element to any program is early intervention
- We do not only need intervention when there are problems, but also
education concerning the behaviour expected from children in school, and
treating others with respect. This should be given to both parents and
children when children first start school and the message should be
regularly reinforced.
- At different ages, different problems emerge, with differing frequencies
and intensities -- there are more problems with younger children, but
more serious ones with older children.
- Different types of programs and interventions are needed for different
age groups
- Programs which depend on volunteers -- parents, peers, community members
-- can be very effective in dealing with mild, early problems where a
supportive and non-threatening intervention might prevent the development
of more serious problems
- Any programs which do use volunteers must provide for proper screening
and training of those volunteers, including evaluation of the suitability
of the volunteer for such work
- Professional interventions, and special off site programs, are needed
for more serious problems
- There is a lack of knowledge of what programs exist and are in use in
our schools. Information and training for parents are needed.
- While special, supportive programs and interventions are a positive
and
constructive response to the problem, there is also a need to review the
discipline policy
- There are concerns that there is no deterrent effect to current
discipline remedies. There must be a logical link between the
seriousness of an infraction, and the consequences of that infraction
- There are concerns that children who do not respond to discipline are
simply shifted from school to school to become some else's problem
- The safety of children, staff, and the community, must be the overriding
concern
- There must be times that we recognise that the system can no longer
effectively deal with certain children who must be released from the
school system, rather than allowing them to compromise the safety and
disrupt the learning of other students
- While we talk of peace in the classroom or violence in our schools,
many
problems occur off the school grounds, when children are en route to and
from school, and this part of the problem tends to be overlooked
- While parents can effectively support and work for initiatives in
this
area, they do not have the resources or the time to be the driving force
behind them.
- The school board, as the agency responsible for the operation of the
schools, needs to take the lead role, but to involve the various partners
noted above
- An umbrella initiative is needed to deal with the whole issue of
peace in
the classroom, but there needs to be provision for a number of different
initiatives and special programs to be pursued within that general initiative
- The Board needs to communicate to parents what is being done in this area
- While the establishment of special programs may require a diversion of
resources from other purposes, there should be a significant payback from
programs focusing on early intervention, in reduced demand for
resource-intensive remedial programs with little hope of success at a
later date.
WHAT DO WE WANT TO ACHIEVE FROM TONIGHT'S SESSION?
We'd like to be better informed about what resources are already
available, what programs are already in use and to what extent.
We'd like to know what the people who work in the system think about
these problems, and what they view the solutions to be.
We would like to know that there is a commitment to move ahead with
initiatives in this area.